Finally, the long-awaited results of my market research exercise on behalf of the Tablet.
90 people voted (that's probably more than my readership, so well done to those of you who followed the old precept: vote early and vote often!)
1 person voted (I hope tongue firmly in cheek) for the attack of Fr Tim. At least on Tabletista voted, possibly several times, unless she got her friends to vote too, as the implausible suggestion that it covers the whole range of Catholic opinion received a handful of votes.
But the winner was 'I prefer my dissent to have a pseudo-intellectual air'; this is bad news for the Tablet, as it doesn't suggest any change: just keep on doing what you do best. Unfortunately, while that's the winning idea, it hasn't served you too well...
I was wondering if anyone might suggest my questions were biased or prejudicial: and indeed in the comments some other suggestions were made (see below) but they suggest I was on the right lines:
'I find it's particularly good as a lining for a cat litter tray.'
'My cats prefer to cxxp on the New Statesman or the Guardian, but they are not dissimilar to the Tablet.'
'I love the fact that I can judge the orthodoxy of a priest by asking about the tablet. If he loves the tablet, his theology will be more liberal than I can stomach. If he has reservations or dislikes it, then I can safely listen to his homilies....'
Another poll will be along in a while, when I can think of something equally intellectually challenging.
After all, I wouldn't want to fall into the ways of journalism (see previous post!)
Litany for People Stuck in Waitrose Car Park on the Night Before Christmas
Eve
-
Oh dear God
We just thought we'd slip out for a last-minute almond parfait
and a Basque Cheesecake
and a corn-fed organic free-range Duchy goose
with brandy ...
3 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment