tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-253865779660854699.post6931860997270118310..comments2023-10-15T09:36:12.013+01:00Comments on Countercultural Father: Strange BedfellowsBen Trovatohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15299230935468606845noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-253865779660854699.post-91623330481258901842017-05-21T21:48:25.405+01:002017-05-21T21:48:25.405+01:00That strikes me as a very pertinent observation. W...That strikes me as a very pertinent observation. When faced with two conflicting statements by the same person or body, it is always tempting to believe the statement that was made without any external pressure or duress... <br /><br />Of course, it could be simple human error, I suppose; but it is odd that they have not clarified that and how the error arose.<br /><br />Deep waters, these, and, I fear, murky...Ben Trovatohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15299230935468606845noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-253865779660854699.post-58158719101045264942017-05-18T11:01:39.819+01:002017-05-18T11:01:39.819+01:00So when they thought no one was paying attention, ...So when they thought no one was paying attention, they said they HAD received funding: the original DSC/DRE email stated that "The CES has received funding to cover the printing and distribution of a hard copy for each school." However, now the link between LGBT promoting organisations and the document have been proven, they are saying that "The Catholic Education Service did not receive any outside funding for either writing, printing or distributing its document on homophobia". So which is it? Why did the original email state that they had received funding if they hadn't?Sitsiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12410440649485944766noreply@blogger.com